Answer: OPENNESS.
This scenario clearly depicts a lack of the openness element of trust.
Elements of trust are openness; reliability; congruence and acceptance.
Openness can be defined as an act of having an accomodating attitude or opinion, i.e receptivity to new ideas, behaviors, cultures, peoples, environments, experiences, etc.,
This definition clearly goes against all that Martha is. Not receptive; unwilling to share ideas.
C - Mexico granted its norhter terrorities to the US. The US terrority now reached all the way to the Pacific Ocean in the west.
The Mexican American war resulted in the Treaty of Guadalupe and gave the US sovereignty over Texas and western terrorities.
Answer:
They lend moisture, crunch and freshness and provide a wonderful foil for heavy, rich ingredients. They are, however, almost entirely water, and thus over extended periods are prone to wilting and, worse, making bread soggy.
The 5 basic elements of plating
Create a framework. Start with drawings and sketches to visualise the plate. ...
Keep it simple. Select one ingredient to focus on and use space to simplify the presentation. ...
Balance the dish. ...
Get the right portion size. ...
Highlight the key ingredient.
When someone claims the 5th amendment rights that means that the person can refuse to answer questions about a possible crime or anything that they believe could incriminate them. Basically, they can't make you testify against yourself if you don't want to. The person in the questions knows something that might incriminate him but he doesn't have to answer because he doesn't want to get in trouble.
The correct answer is irony
Sarcasm and Irony are ways of expressing a statement with a connotative meaning, that is, figurative.
Irony, on the other hand, means “asking by pretending not to know the answer”, “disguise” or “concealment”. The curious thing is that this word has been used, in the past, to refer to ignorance or ignorance about something.
Since the Aristotelian period, sarcasm and irony were already recorded in the speeches. The philosopher Aristotle used these artifices of language when pretending not to understand the idea expressed by the interlocutor, confronting him until he came to a contradiction in speech.
The grammar explains sarcasm and irony as figures of speech used outside their real meaning, which express a tone of debauchery. The difference between sarcasm and irony is that while the first is said in a malicious and harsh tone, the second is a contradictory phrase that generally has a sense of humor.
