Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What is congruency?</h3>
The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.
An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.
See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.
Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.
The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".
Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
Learn more about congruency at
brainly.com/question/14418374
#SPJ1
Answer:
yes, it is equivalent!!
Step-by-step explanation:
6(3x + 1) = 18x + 6
9x + 6 + 9x combined will also equal 18x + 6
The percent error is 34.28 %.
Hope this helps! Be safe out there.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
edge2021
Answer: (-19/80, -1/2)
Step By Step Explanation:
First you want to do 2/5 - 7/8. Once you get -19/40, you want to divide it by 2. After doing this step, you will get -19/80. Next, you want to do the same thing with the other one. -2/5 -3/5 or 2/5+3/5 except the answer will be negative. Now you get -1/2. Therefore, the answer is (-19/80, -1/2). Sorry if my explanation is trashy.
