Answer:
you should write it just like it says
Answer:
The correct answer is C.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Each ceiling fan has 20 separate parts.
The direct materials cost is $ 85
Each ceiling fan requires 3 hours of machine time to manufacture.
Activity (Allocation Base) - Predetermined Overhead Allocation Rate
Materials handling (Number of parts) - $0.04
Machining (Machine hours) - $7.8
Assembling (Number of parts) - $0.35
Packaging (Number of finished units) - $3
Total unitary cost= direct material + allocated overhead
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Total unitary cost= 85 + (0.04*20 + 7.8*3 + 0.35*20 + 3*1)= $119.2
Given these assumptions, you should not buy this hybrid.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The idea of the present value factor depends on the time estimation of cash - that is, cash gotten now is worth more than cash got later on, since cash got now can be reinvested in an elective speculation to procure extra money.
The PV of the savings funds is $2,070 which is not exactly the cost of difference. You need a more noteworthy reserve funds to financially legitimize the acquisition of this hybrid car (for example the NPV is negative).
If their father Dave allows them to trade chores to achieve gains from trade then "Henry will clean bath tubs; Rose will wash the windows".
<u>Option: C</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
In this scenario Henry is washing 20 windows or 2 bath tabs in an hour, which showcase his average washing of 10 windows over 1 bath tab in half hour. While here Rose is washing 30 windows or 1 bath tab in an hour by giving average of 15 windows over half bath tab in half hour, which is less than Henry's average of washing.
Thus on considering the above average of work performed by Henry and Rose in equal amount of given time for work, Henry is more prominent to be specialized in cleaning bath tubs while Rose will more expert in washing windows because she is cleaning more windows than Henry in same on hour of time.
Answer: The answer is that, AD has shifted to exactly $0.35 trillion.
Explanation:
It should be noticed that, AD has been shifted to exactly $0.35 trillion (Rounded in two decimal places.) when the the long-run aggregate supply curve shifted to the right from one year to the next.
