The above answer is definitely correct in its details. I'd just like to emphasize a couple of important ideas about Hoover's response.
<span>He tried to do more to fix the economy than any president had ever done before. The government had been very hands-off up to that point.He believed the government should not go in debt no matter what. This limited what he was willing to do. Please note that economists back then agreed with this idea so it's not like Hoover was just being mean. In fact, FDR believed the same thing and it's often said that he undermined the New Deal by trying to balance the budget too soon.</span>
So, overall what I want to point out is that Hoover did more than anyone else, and he did what most economists of the time would have said was the right thing to do. But it didn't work and so he's seen as one of the worst presidents ever, which seems a bit unfair.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
- The strategy execution method offers a systematic framework to explain, interact, enforce, and conduct policy. The objective of this project would be to ensure that the organization focuses on building value-added technologies and implementing value-optimizing expenditures.
- Bringing together a good leadership people with the highest combination of talents, abilities, as well as the desire to do tasks has become one of the measures to follow to initiate this venture.
Other choices have no relation with the specified scenario. So Option C seems to be the right response.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. The journal entries are shown below:
On December 1
Cash A/c Dr $1,260
To Deferred Service Revenue $1,260
(Being cash is received)
On December 31, 2016
Deferred Service Revenue $420 ($1,260 ÷ 3 months)
To Service revenue $420
(Being service revenue is recorded)
2. Income statement
Earned income from car washing services $420
Balance sheet
Assets
Cash $1,260
Liabilities
Deferred Service Revenue $840 ($1,260 - $420)
Answer:
Workplace discrimination prevents the firm from using the full potential of those employees that are being discriminated against.
Explanation:
For example, if the firm discriminates against a specific group of people when hiring (for example, it can discriminate against older people), the firm could lose valuable potential employees that could have provided great skill and experience for the firm.
If the firm practices discrimination against employees, the operation in the company will not be as streamlined as it could be against discrimination because those who are being treated poorly will be less motivated and have lesser output.
