1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ymorist [56]
3 years ago
13

Suppose a Lexus LS400 and a Mercedes C300 are considered to be of equivalent value. The Lexus sells for 6,000,000 Japanese yen i

n Tokyo and the Mercedes sells for 50,000 euros in Stuttgart. Using the purchasing power parity theory, explain the exchange rate between the yen and the euro.
Business
1 answer:
yarga [219]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1 EUR = 120 JPY

Explanation:

As the purchasing power parity theory, the exchange rate of currency 1 to currency 2  = Cost of good  in currency 1 / cost of same valued item  in currency 2

In this case,  a Lexus LS400 and a Mercedes C300 are considered to be of equivalent value, then the exchange rate between the yen and the euro

= price of Lexus in Tokyo/ price of Mercedes  in Stuttgart

= 6,000,000 JPY/ 50,000 EUR

= 120 JPY/EUR

You might be interested in
Consider a simple example economy where there are two goods, coconuts and restaurant meals (coconut-based). There are two firms.
tekilochka [14]

A) Product Approach

GDP = Value added of all industries

Value added = revenue - intermediate costs

Value added coconut producer = $20,000,000 (it does not have intermediate costs)

Value added restaurant = $30,000,000 - $12,000,000 (cost of coconuts)

                                        = $18,000,000

Value added government = $5,500,000 (collected in taxes, $3 million from the restaurant, $1.5 million from the coconut producer, and $1 million from consumers).

GDP = $20,000,000 + $18,000,000 + $5,500,000

        = $43,000,000

B) Expenditure Approach

GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government Spending + Net Exports

Consumption = $8,000,000 in coconuts + $30,000,000 in meals

                       = $38,000,000

Investment = $0

Government Spending = $5,500,000 in government wages

Net Exports = $0 (it is a closed-economy)

GDP = $38,000,000 + $0 + $5,500,000 + $0

       = $43,500,000

C) Income Approach

Wages = $14,500,000

Corporate Profits  = $24,000,000

Interest income = $500,000

Taxes = $4,500,000

GDP = $43,500,000

e. How does this new piece of information affect your calculations in the expenditure approach? Explain.

GDP under the expenditure approach, would rise by the value of the unsold coconuts ($1 million) as long as the coconuts were harvested in the given year. This is because inventory produced in the given year, is part of that year's GDP.

7 0
3 years ago
81. The forward rate of the Swiss franc is $.50. The spot rate of the Swiss franc is $.48. The following interest rates exist: U
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

invest  = $96,914

so correct option is d. $96,914

Explanation:

given data

forward rate of the Swiss franc = $.50

spot rate of the Swiss franc = $.48

pay a sum = SF200,000

solution

we know Borrow is here

Borrow = \frac{SF200000}{1.05}

Borrow = SF190,476

and

when we convert it will be

Convert SF190,476 is

Convert  = SF190,476  × $.48 = $91,428

so investment at 6 % is

Invest = 6 % of $91,428 + $91,428

invest = $5485.68 + $91,428

invest  = $96,914

so correct option is d. $96,914

7 0
3 years ago
If the reserve ratio is 15 percent, and banks do not hold excess reserves, and people hold only deposits and no currency, then w
8090 [49]

Answer:

Option (B) is correct.

Explanation:

Given that,

Required reserve ratio = 15 percent

Bonds sell to public = $25.5 million

Bank reserves decreases by $25.5 million because of the purchasing of bonds from the Fed.

Money multiplier:

= 1/Required reserve ratio

= 1/0.15

= 6.67

Therefore, the money supply decreases by:

= Money multiplier × $25.5 million

= 6.67 × $25.5 million

= $170 million

7 0
3 years ago
Altogether the national, state, and local governments of the United States spend about a __________ of our gross domestic produc
stealth61 [152]

Answer:

According to the OECD the total expenditure of the US government, including state and local is about a 38% of the GDP.

Explanation:

The federal government expends almost the 55% of the total and the remaining 45% the state and local government.

5 0
3 years ago
What would happen if a supplier charged more than the market price
Yuri [45]
Equilibrium is the intersect of the two curves. The curves show you how much the producers supply and how much the consumers demand at each possible price. 

The demand curves shows that the higher the price is, the less the consumers demand. That's obvious—the consumer wants something, but not at any price. He's only willing to pay so much. If the price goes higher and higher, less and less people want to buy the good. 

The higher the price is, the more the producers can supply. This is because some producers are able to produce at lower costs; they're better and more efficient than other producers. Other producers, who produce at higher costs, would go bankrupt if they tried to produce at lower prices. But when the price goes up, even the worse producers, who have higher costs, are able to make profit. So, more producers supply to the market. 

What happens now, when the price gets lower than the equlibrium? As you can see from the chart, producers would supply less than consumers would be willing to consume at that particular price. There would be SHORTAGE. This happens when the goverment sets price ceilings (like on gas in the 30's). An opposite situation happens when there is price floor—for example minimum wage (because wages are prices too; prices of labor). In that case, there is surplus—in case of minimum wage that means surplus of labor (unemployment). 

But when the markets are free to set the price, they will quickly establish equlibrium again. The producers will see that there is a shortage. They'll realize they can set higher prices and make bigger profits. They can't set higher price than the equilibrium though, because there would be surplus and they would have their warehouses stuffed with goods noone wants to buy at that price. 

This is the Answer Am 100% sure.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ULab Inc., a biotechnology firm, lost one of its offices in a fire. The employees did not have a fire drill, and the 10-story bu
    5·1 answer
  • A company wants to set up operations in a country with the following corporate tax rate structure: Taxable Income Tax Rate <$
    13·1 answer
  • Indicate which of the functions of money (a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and a store of value) each of the following p
    12·1 answer
  • Bob contributed a building with an adjusted basis to Bob of $50,000 and a fair market value of $150,000 subject to a mortgage of
    14·1 answer
  • Expenses are recognized Multiple Choice when a petty cash account is established. when an employee is reimbursed for expenses in
    14·2 answers
  • Vision Tech’s stock price is currently trading at $17 per share. The consensus among analysts is that the intrinsic value of Vis
    5·1 answer
  • Over the first four years of a company's life, it earned the following net income (loss):______.
    11·1 answer
  • Should P&G have more or fewer marketing and advertising agencies doing its advertising?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the best source of information to use when purchasing a new car?
    8·1 answer
  • Do It! Review 9-2a On January 1, 2017, Salt Creek Country Club purchased a new riding mower for $17,500. The mower is expected t
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!