Answer:
Josh can recover even if he was negligent and violated the employer's rules.
Explanation:
Worker's compensation is a type of insurance that covers wage and medical costs of an employee that was injured in the course of working for the employer.
Accidents can happen during the course of doing official duty, so worker's compensation provides a cover from financial burden when the employee becomes unproductive as a result of the accident.
Generally the issue of negligence on the part of the employee is not considered.
So Jos will be able to recover worker compensation when he was injured from the car gas tank explosion.
The efficient market theory would be violated if investors earned extraordinary returns months after a company announced unexpected profits. Thus, the correct option is (d.) Investors earn abnormal returns months after a firm announces surprise earnings.
<h3>What exactly is the hypothesis of an efficient market?</h3>
The efficient-market hypothesis is a financial economics concept that asserts asset prices represent all available information. Because market prices should only react to fresh information, it is impossible to continually "beat the market" on a risk-adjusted basis.
Because the EMH is expressed in terms of risk adjustment, it can only offer testable predictions when combined with a specific risk model. As a result, financial economics research has focused on market anomalies, or departures from specified risk models, since at least the 1990s.
To learn more about Efficient-market hypothesis, click
brainly.com/question/28529377
#SPJ4
Well they can clap,yell,and be cheerful if it was good.
Answer:
Merchandise inventory is an asset reported on the balance sheet and represents the cost of products purchased for sale.
Explanation:
Merchandise inventory is the stock of the company and the same is to be reported under the current asset side of the balance sheet also the asset contains normal debit balance. In addition to this, it shows the cost of product buy for sale
Therefore the last option is correct
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, the missing question read;
Version 1: George walks away. He never talks to Elaine or Jerry again.
Version 2: George confronts Elaine, saying “I am angry about what you have been saying. I do not want you spreading rumors about me. If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
Version 3: George yells at Elaine to shut u.p and then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired.
Version 4: George demands that Elaine tell him where she heard that. Elaine tells him not to worry about it and tries to crack a joke about how much the boss is late.
Answer:
- <u>Version 1: non-confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 2: cooperative</u>
- <u>Version 3: confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 4: confrontational and cooperative</u>
Explanation:
1. In this scenario it is evident that George avoids confrontation with Elaine. In fact, we are told that "[He] walks away..."
2. In this scenario, however, we notice a cooperative deposition between George and Elaine. He made this lear when he said, "...If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
3. Confrontation occurs in this scenario as we are told that "George... then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired. "
4. By demanding "that Elaine tells him where she heard that" indicates confrontation. While Elaine's cracking a joke about how much the boss is late shows cooperation.
