Answer:
The last one I believe
Step-by-step explanation:
The first one IS a function. The rest are not.
Answer:
X = -y -3
X= -2y + 3 (if correct, please mark brainliest. :))
Step-by-step explanation:
H_TM is reduced to HALT_TM and as such, HALT_TM is undecidable.
<h3>How to Interpret Machine Language?</h3>
A language is referred to as Decidable or Recursive if there is a Turing machine that accepts and halts on every input string w. This tells us that every decidable language is Turing-Acceptable.
Now, we are told that the halting language is reducible to some language B. This means that it is an undecidability via reduction.
Now, Using the idea that “ If A is undecidable and reducible to B, then B is undecidable.” Suppose R decides HALT_TM, we will construct S to decide ATM .
S = “On input (M, B)
This means that H_TM is reduced to HALT_TM and as such, HALT_TM is undecidable.
Read more about machine language at; brainly.com/question/28026656
#SPJ1
Samuel could round both of the individual numbers, to get s rounded answer. So, he could round 23 to 20, and 395 to 400, to get a product of 8000.
Or, he could multiply the numbers first, so 23*395 to get a product of 9085, which would then round to 9000, or depends on what place value it would want to be rounded to.
