Answer:antisocial personality disorder; psychopathy
Explanation:
Antisocial personality disorder is a mental based disorder that causes someone to manipulated and exploits other people's right without even feeling bad about doing that.
This may result to them having had relationships with others and commuting criminal activities. A person pays no attention to their acts whether it right or wrong or whether it hurts others. It is also called sociopath.
Psychopathy a person act in a way that pay no regard to social rules and may pretend normal in front of others such that you may begin to trust them but when they hit you they hit you hard with no remorse. The difference between these two is that a psychopath has no conscience in them where as a sociopath has some conscience eventhough it's not that strong they may feel a bit of guilt but still they will continue with their action.
<u>Scientists</u><u>' argument over the relative importance of heredity and environmental influences is called the</u><u> nature-nurture debate.</u>
What does nurture refer to in the nature vs nurture debate?
- Reviewed by Psychology Today Staff. The expression “nature vs. nurture” describes the question of how much a person's characteristics are formed by either “nature” or “nurture.”
- “Nature” means innate biological factors (namely genetics), while “nurture” can refer to upbringing or life experience more generally.
What does nurture refer to?
Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture.
Who said nature vs. nurture?
The phrase 'nature versus nurture' was first coined in the mid-1800s by the English Victorian polymath Francis Galton in discussion about the influence of heredity and environment on social advancement.
Learn more about nurture
brainly.com/question/11333427
#SPJ4
Carrie should use a punnett square
Explanation:
Read the excerpt from the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision. We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. . . . [The courts must issue] orders and decrees . . . to admit to public schools on a racially nondiscriminatory basis with all deliberate speed the parties to these cases. Brown v. Board of Education, Chief Justice Earl Warren, 1954–1955 Which phrase did state leaders who were opposed to integration use to drag out the process of desegregation?
Whats your question? id love to help but it doesnt seem like theres a question in what you posted.
