Answer: are motivated to pay attention; central
The elaboration likelihood model was developed by Richard Petty and John Cacioppo in 1980. The process describes how thought can arise in two different ways, or as a result of two different processes through the change of attitudes.
The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion describes the central route and the peripheral route as the two routes to persuasion.
The model explains that people who are thoughtful and considerate will take the central route of persuasion.
While persuasion will occur with positive or negative relation.
Answer:
He spent a great deal of time immersing himself in nature, testing scientific laws, dissecting bodies (human and animal) and thinking and writing about his observations.
Explanation:
Probably because of his abundance of diverse interests, da Vinci failed to complete a significant number of his paintings and projects.
Answer:
I agree. I think that the system could greatly benefit from a change in how things are done.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which professional tenet has the educator violated? Would be: Protecting students from any practice that harms, or has the potential to harm, students.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer comes from the very principle placed in the question: Principle II: Responsibility for Professional Competence: C: The professional educator acts in the best interest of all students.
In this scenario, specifically, the educator finds herself with the situation of a student that she has learned places that student in direct danger. He has to walk home every day and go through a portion of town where gang problems are present. Not only that, but she learns that her student has had to face fights with these gang members on several ocassions, which means that her student has faced not only harm, but the danger of becoming involved with gangs. Instead of acting as she should have professionally, which was to seek the best steps to help the student resolve his issue, she decides to only tell him to be careful and never says anything about the case. This completely violates her duty as a teacher to protect her students and ensure that potential harming situations are dealt with appropriately.
I agree because if no one had a reason as to why they did the idea, how would we have known how to do it ourselves.
