Answer:
I think whom. Since it sounds better then who in that sentence.
Answer:
A warrior <u>frightens</u> a gruesome monster <u>away.</u>
Explanation:
When you complete a sentence you have to make sure that the combination o verb and predicate are compatible, and that they express in the best possible way what you are trying to say. So let's analyze the answers:
1) frightens; away: this is grammatically correct, and both words combine well and add meaning to the message.
2) splits; in half: this is grammatically incorrect, it would have to be "into halves" or "in two"
3) kills; forever: kills already implies is forever, it is repetitive
4)beats; in pieces: beats doesn't imply that the monster was split into pieces, so these two words don't combine.
Answer: A. Pathos and logos
In this passage, the speaker uses both pathos, which is an appeal to emotion, and logos, which refers to an appeal based on logic. She first states that because she does not have a license, she cannot drive. This is a logical argument. Afterwards, she states that it is "totally embarrasing" to be driven to the party by her father. In this case, the speaker makes an appeal to pathos, or to emotions.
A key concept is an attack that took place. It is developed by providing further explanation of the US Pacific Fleet casualties and the all the warships damaged. and sunk.
