Explain no because the right called freedom of speech is still a thing and they are taking away his freedom of speech. I would write for you but I’m not good at writing very well
International law defines genocide in terms of violence committed “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,” yet this approach fails to acknowledge the full impacts of cultural destruction. There is insufficient international discussion of “cultural genocide,” which is a particular threat to the world's indigenous minorities. Despite the recent adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which acknowledges the rights to culture, diversity, and self-determination, claims of cultural genocide are often derided, and their indicators dismissed as benign effects of modernity and indigenous cultural diffusion. This article considers the destruction of indigenous cultures and the forced assimilation of indigenous peoples through the analytical lens of genocide. Two case studies—the federally unrecognized Winnemem Wintu tribe in northern California and the Inuit of northern Canada—are highlighted as illustrative examples of groups facing these challenges. Ultimately, this article seeks to prompt serious discussion of cultural rights violations, which often do not involve direct physical killing or violence, and consideration of the concept “cultural genocide” as a tool for human rights promotion and protection.
Answer:
Explanation:
Assume that after each shaking, a silver dollar has an equal chance of "head" or "tail" up.
There will be likely 100/2 = 50 dollar coins with "heads" up. Removing them leaves 50 coins.
Again after the second shakes, 50/2 = 25 coins will likely be "heads" up. Removing them leaves 25 coins.
After the third shakes, approximately 25/2 = 12.5 coins will be "heads" up. Of course there is no 0.5 coin. Rounding up you likely get to keep 13 dollar coins.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
If they were the same, they wouldn't have diff names.
