The appropriate response is Random sample. A simple random sample is a subset of a measurable populace in which every individual from the subset has an equivalent likelihood of being picked. A case of a basic irregular specimen would be the names of 25 workers being picked out of a cap from an organization of 250 representatives.
"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
<span>Good Morning!
</span><span>To keep costs to a minimum for consumers
</span><span>
In theory, the government's interest in regulating natural monopolies is to meet consumer rights, giving access and lowering costs in order to avoid price abuse.
Hugs!</span>
Answer:
Kaiser Wilhelm's aggressive military build-up and his disregard for attempts at peace, is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The triple alliance was formed by Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy in 1882, and agreed to assist each other in case of attack by either France of Russia. <em><u>Britain and France were afraid of German Navy, so in 1904 </u></em>they signed Entente Cordiale to cooperate against the threat of Germany. Russia also joined later. Triple Entente merely stated that it was a moral obligation of the three signatories to help each other.
