Answer:
d. all inputs are fully processed; however, only the attended input reaches consciousness.
Explanation:
Late selection models states that the information is selected after looking for the meaning, which is opposite to the earlier stages of processing. According to this models, all the information is attended to whether purposely or un purposely.
Here all the inputs are processed but those inputs which are attended intentionally reaches consciousness.
Hence the correct option is (d).
<u>Answer:
</u>
The Caribbean today characterized by grave intolerance and mistrust at all levels because of its historical background.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- By exploring the Caribbean history, society and concept of identity they are mostly seeded by sexuality, racism and religion.
- Indeed, the 'Caribbean' today is shaped by its 'history' and is characterized by various people, which are not accepting of the values, norms, lifestyles and beliefs of others, that has lead to grave intolerance and mistrust on all levels.
Speed is the distance travelled in a time period but acceleration is the change in the speed of body in a given period.
The S.I. units are
Speed=ms^-1
Acceleration=ms^-2
In 727 Kush took control of Egypt and rule until the Assyrians arrived. Rome conquered Egypt and eventually collapsed sometime in the 300s CE. The Kingdom of Kush had two different capital cities.
Answer:
actor/observer discrepancy; fundamental attribution error
Explanation:
Actor-Observer bias: In social psychology, the term actor-observer bias or discrepancy is defined as the phenomenon in which an individual tends to attribute his or her behavior to external cause and therefore attributing the other person's behavior as an internal cause.
Fundamental attribution error: In psychology, the term fundamental attribution error was proposed by Lee Ross who was a social psychologist during 1977. It is defined as the phenomenon in which an individual describes the other person's behavior based on the internal factors including personality whereas underestimating the external factors influence including situational influence.
In the question above, Wally's behavior can be explained in terms of actor-observer discrepancy whereas John behavior is explained in terms of the fundamental attribution error.