Examine the sources of information that the person or book or website uses. Do they have actual sources of information or are they just presenting material without giving any backing or citations? If they do reference sources, are they places of information that have authority? "Many people are saying," for instance, doesn't actually cite a real source, whereas "The Department of Housing and Urban Development reported _______" is offering strong source credentials.
Also examine the credentials of the author or website itself. Is the author someone with training and a track record in the subject being covered? (Example: A university professor in that subject area.) Does the website get cited by other agencies, or has the book or site been noted with any awards? "Bubba's Blog" is not as reputable or reliable as <em>The New York Times.</em>
Does the person or site seek to offer objective information, or is it biased toward the support of only a particular position or agenda? Sometimes the bias will be shown in the sponsors or backers of a particular book or site. Other times you can tell just by reading, that it only presents one side of an argument and does not take any other perspectives into consideration. It's fine to pay attention to sources that are biased, but then give attention to sources on BOTH sides of that bias, not just one side, so that you as a researcher can remain objective.
Answer:
France and Britain declared war, but remained relatively inactive militarily.
Explanation:
Second World War started with the Nazi invading Poland. The German air force, destroyed Polish planes, railways, tanks, crushed defence networks, and bombed Warsaw. For Hitler, the conquest of Poland was only the prelude to a German empire stretching from the Atlantic to the Urals. The invasion of Germany in Poland led Britain and France to declare war on Hitler's Nazi state in retaliation. Both Britain and France remain inactive in the beginning by only observing the activities of Hitler.
Imperialiam increase "The Battlefield of the War" in many ways. For one, it propelled the armies to forge ahead into direct conflicts with their enemies. This would hopefully secure more land, as well as a way to further expand their respective empires.
The gulf of tonkin gave the President of the United States (Lyndon B. Johnson) the right to use any military force that was deemed conventional without the declaration of war by Congress in Southeast Asia and to assist any army, whether legitimate or not. This started the rapid escalation from the Americans in the Vietnam War and their rapid warfare against North Vietnam.
He didn't want anymore of his people hurt or affected from the war.