I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Look for glassy or bloodshot eyes.
Notice how the person smells.
Watch for impaired motor function.
Notice if the person slurs their speech.
Answer:
b. unlimited wants and limited resources.
Explanation:
There are different definitions of economics. Some say it´s a science that studies the production, distribution and consumption of good and services. Another definition refers to the theories and models that govern the market process. But definitely, economics must strike a balance between a society´s wants - that may be unlimited - and the limited resources available.
true, a group of young girls accused some women of afflicting them
1. No confidentiality. This is the deadliest downfall of crowdsourcing. ... Putting your naming challenge out for crowdsourcing can clue in competitors to what you're up to and make it possible for someone else to see your great new idea and run away with it.
