Answer: Step 1) Find share of market in the Portfolio
(11.5-3.5)x+3.5=6.5
8x=3
x=3/8
x=0.375
=37.5%
SD of market portfolio= 0.375x+0=9.5
x=9.5/0.375
=25.33%
correl = cov / (std 1 * std2)
0.4=COV/0.2533*0.545
COV= 0.2533*0.545*0.4=0.05
cov of 2 assets = b1 * b2 * variance of market
0.05=B1*1*0.2533^2
B of security=0.0032
Capm Model
3.5+0.0032(11.5-3.5)=3.5256% expected return
Explanation:
Step 1) Find the share of market in the portfolio in order to find market SD
Step 2) Find Covariance betweens security and market by using both SDS and correlation
Step 3) Find Beta of Security using Co variance
Step 4) Use the Beta in CAPM model in order to find expected return
Answer:
1. $34 million
2. $0
Explanation:
Given that,
Fair value of Centerpoint Inc = $256 million
Book value of Centerpoint's net assets (excluding goodwill) = $228 million
Book value of Centerpoint's net assets (including goodwill) = 290 million
1. Actual Value of Goodwill:
= Fair Value of Centrepoint Inc. - Book Value of Net assets (excluding goodwill)
= $256 million - 228 million
= $28 million
Loss on Impairment of Goodwill:
= Goodwill recorded - Actual value of goodwill
= $62 million - $28 million
= $34 million
2. In this case Fair value of ($318 million) is more than Book value ($290 million) then there will be no Impairment Loss.
It means that the loss on Impairment of Goodwill = $0.
The statement, "During most of the Soviet rule (and certainly after 1934), any form of experimental art was considered dissident and, therefore, could only exist as a part of underground culture" is True
Option a
<u>Explanation:
</u>
All across the 1920s, the creation of Soviet Art was followed by an era of severe ideological competitiveness among artistic groups, which each tried to ensure that their views were given a priority for the determination of the shapes and instructions under which soviet art will also grow.
The increasing crisis of radical left wing artwork done this fight even more angry, In the late 1930's, several avant-garde movements that emerged in the 1910s had become tired and began depicting artifacts in real life, as they sought to return to the traditional model of drawn pictures.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
Answer:
17%
Explanation:
Purchase price of bond = $921.77
Years investment held = n = 7
Coupon rate = C = 15%
Frequency of payment = m = 2
Annual coupon = $1,000 × (0.15/2) = $75.00
Realized Yield = i
Selling price of bond = PB = $961.22
The realized rate of return is approximately 16.6 percent. Using a financial calculator provided an exact yield of 16.625 percent.
