<u>Answer:</u>
Yes, there is a social contract between the rulers and the ruled in Tanzania.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- For the law, order, and the state of the process, the meaning of the Social contract is the fundamental rule.
- Citizens are to be an organization that makes an arrangement to live in harmony and to maintain the human rights of people.
- The Developed Government is for the entire citizens and its primary focus is to give individuals safeguards and assurance.
- Taking into account that the Tanzanian constitution implies shared participation between the governed people and the authorities, the people of Tanzania must be unreservedly acknowledged to their benefit.
Answer:
unethical
1. if they are allowing individuals under the age of 21 in they need to have a stamp or a badge that has to be visable or they will be kicked out.
2 the individuals that are the age or above 21 should have a different badge that indicates that they are the age of or above 21 and must be visible or they will get kicked out.
3 if they are allowing underage individuals in they must have people watching them so they don't sneak alcoholic beverages.
Explanation:
Answer:
i think that they have just the right amount of rights depending on what they did if its something really ad as if there sentence is death penalty or life in prison they should have fewer but that's my opinion and i think it has gone positive.
Explanation:
Answer:
Mainly, the greatest benefit of solving problems outside the judicial system is the cost, since every judicial process necessarily entails a high cost, both in taxes, costs, fees, etc. In addition, the resolution time is much longer, since it involves a whole series of procedural steps that necessarily imply a passage in time, which can be avoided through an alternative resolution of conflicts.
Those means of alternative dispute resolution include, among others, mediation and arbitration. Mediation, on the one hand, involves a series of meetings between the parties in conflict, with the assistance of a specialist, the mediator, who seeks to bring the parties closer together and achieve the resolution of the dispute. On the other hand, arbitration implies that the parties in conflict abide by the solution proposed by an impartial third party, the arbitrator, who will decide according to the rules of law or equity, as appropriate.
