Answer:
a. 199,389
b. b. From the part A, the question suggests a 0.9% yearly decrease which amounts to 199,389. This answer does not correspond to their recorded figure because the 0.9% decrease was just an average taken over the period. There could be years that the decrease was way smaller than the recorded average, thus using average may not be a good way for calculating population decrease over a period of time.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Population in 2009 = 192,370
This means that in 2005 the population = 192,370 x 1.009 x 1.009 x 1.009 x 1.009 = 199,389
b. From the part A, the question suggests a 0.9% yearly decrease which amounts to 199,389. This answer does not correspond to their recorded figure because the 0.9% decrease was just an average taken over the period. There could be years that the decrease was way smaller than the recorded average, thus using average may not be a good way for calculating population decrease over a period of time.
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
For range you will take the largest and the smallest number and subtract it.
10-2=8
Answer:
oyx9tx9tz9tzt9x9tx0
Step-by-step explanation:
xxy0xpycypcu0cy9ox9tx9t
Answer:
N=8
Step-by-step explanation:
6N=48
Divide by 6 both sides
6N/6=48/6
N=8
