<span>A prokaryote is a unicellular organism that belongs to either the domain Bacteria or the domain Archaea. Therefore, unlike a eukaryote, the prokaryote lacks in a nucleus and other organelles. The first organisms that appeared about 3.5 billions years ago were prokaryotes. They developed primitive forms of photosynthesis without oxygen as a waste. The first photosynthesizing prokaryotes appeared about 2.7 billion years ago which led to the changes in Earth atmosphere and consequently organisms dependant on oxygen could arise.</span>
According to modern classification I will say that Jake is correct. With the use of tracing back and DNA technology then we can say that this is the digital way which is used nowadays to classify animals.
Sophie says through her observation that the characteristics of the animal classification used.
Answer:
Because this may be an exacerbation of psychosis, the provider may increase the dose of the FGA.
Explanation:
Schizophrenia may be defined as the medical condition in which the individual is not able to understand the reality and interpret the reality in the different ways.
FGA (First-generation antipsychotics) is the treatment used for the patients suffering from schizophrenia. This medication is quite reasonable and cheap. Even after the failure of FGA, the patient needs to go for the different treatment. The further increase of FGA doses might affect the individual health.
Thus, the correct answer is option (B).
The Hardy-Weinberg equation is as follows:


Where:
(convert all % to decimals)
p= homozygous dominant
q= homozygous recessive
pq= heterozygous
While you did not specify whether the 0.2 frequency was for dominant or recessive, we can still figure out the answer.
Using the 1st equation, we can solve for the other dominant/recessive frequency:
1-0.2=0.8
Meaning that:
p= 0.8 & q=0.2
If the heterozygouz frequency is 2pq, then it becomes a simple "plug & chug" sort of approach.
2(0.8)(0.2)= 2(0.16)= 0.32
So, the heterozygous frequency would be:
0.32
Hope this helps!
They both carry a recessive allele for blue eyes because answer A doesnt state anything about the allele dominance, answer B wouldnt be right because if blue eyes was dominant then the mother would have blue eyes as the dominant gene always shows, but she has brown