Answer:
150 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
Graphing the complex number we see the angle terminates in the second quadrant. This means the argument, the angle, will be between 90 degrees and 180 degrees.
So if we create a right triangle with that point after graphing it. We see the height of that triangle is 5 because that is the imaginary part. The base of that triangle has length
. The problem is this doesn't give us any part of the angle we want, but it does give us the complementary of the part of the angle that is in second quadrant.
Let's find the complementary angle.
So the opposite side of the complementary angle is 5.
The adjacent side of the complementary angle is
.




So 90-30=60.
The answer therefore 60+90=150.
For this case , the parent function is given by [tex f (x) =x^2
[\tex]
We apply the following transformations
Vertical translations :
Suppose that k > 0
To graph y=f(x)+k, move the graph of k units upwards
For k=9
We have
[tex]h(x)=x^2+9
[\tex]
Horizontal translation
Suppose that h>0
To graph y=f(x-h) , move the graph of h units to the right
For h=4 we have :
[tex ] g (x) =(x-4) ^ 2+9
[\tex]
Answer :
The function g(x) is given by
G(x) =(x-4)2 +9
Answer:
y = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
varies inversely
xy = k
y = 7 when x = 2/3
(2/3)7 = k
14/3 = k
k = 14/3
--------------------
find y when x = 7/3
(7/3)y = 14/3
multiply both sides by 3/7
y = 14/3 * 3/7
y = 2
So I believe that the position the triangle is sitting in is the original position that the question started with correct? (Wasn't sure if you moved it before the screenshot or not)
So for all three points of the triangle, move each of them 6 units to the left since the rule has (x-6). If it was x+6, it should be 6 units to the right then.
After you move it 6 units to the left, move the points (all three) 4 units down since (y-4) means moving in the y-direction downward!
That should be the new place for the triangle to be positioned.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
(
)
Step-by-step explanation:
The fastest way to do this is to convert both equations into slope-intercept form and graph it to find the solution point. If you wanted to do this algebraically, you might want to start out by getting rid of the fractions and using either substitution or elimination to find x and y.