Answer:
If we find out that technology has shifted the labor demand to the left, this is a disadvantage to labor.
Explanation:
To begin with, It's important to properly understand the concept of Marginal Product of Labour.
In simple terms, marginal product of labor is basically the change in unit output occasioned by a unit change in labor. There are a number of factors that may cause a marginal change in labor. Suffix to say, marginal change can either be to the right or to the left.
To narrow it down, we have technology to consider as one of the factors that ensue marginal change. Even more, this change can either be to the right or left. That is, an increase in technology might result to an increase in unit labour - this is to the right. And this is beneficial or advantageous to labor. In same vein, a increase in technology might result to a decrease in unit labour - this is to the left. And this is disadvantageous to labor.
It's on established record that introduction of new technologies, procedures and processes often have a direct effect on an individual employee. This altogether affects the marginal product in labour.
Hence, when technology brings changes to the left, this is a disadvantage to labour, as there is possibly a downsizing or reduction in labor strengths occasioned by the new technologies.
Answer:
Status differences.
Explanation:
Since Ken, whose primary job is supervising a small production group, isn't getting cooperation from all members on the cross-functional team he leads. In particular, Bethany, a senior marketing manager, seems to resist his direction and tries to influence team members to go in another direction. The source of conflict in this case may be status differences.
A status difference in workplaces occurs between various workers or employees as a result of perceived thought of being higher than the other employees because of factors such as educational background, qualifications, age, intelligence, gender etc.
Basically, the top executives or human resources managers in organizations should strive really hard to reduce status differences at workplace through counseling, because it inhibits growth and development.
<span>Simulation. It is the imitation of the operation of a real-world process or system over time. Simulation testing lays on the intersection of both property-based and example-based testing. It provides strong guarantees about externally-visible, client behavior. This is done in a controlled environment.</span>
Compromising is the conflict-handling style in which both parties give up something to gain something.
<h3>What is the meaning of compromising?</h3>
compromise with someone is when you reach an agreement with them and you later give up on something that you originally wanted.
Therefore, Compromising is the conflict-handling style in which both parties give up on something.
Learn more about compromising at;
brainly.com/question/24769299
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
The action, looking through the paradigm of Utilitarianism would be considered ethical.
Any action especially by the ruling powers, government or political class which regardless of the rule of law is aimed at engineering the social, economic and or political levers of any state to the end that it betters society as a whole would be considered Utilitarian.
Utilitarianism is simply a theory or philosophy which preaches and teaches the need for happiness or pleasure whilst condemning any action, policy, thought or law that stimulates harm and unhappiness.
According to the question, the Privacy Act of 1974 had debarred the acquisition of Intelligence especially for the purpose of transacting business. Sooner or later it purchased, through an entity, information about its citizens on the basis of the need for National Security.
The act of seeking the welfare of the state thus becomes permissible reason under an utilitarian government for it to break a protocol or an existing edict.
Cheers!
Cheers!