Given that racial-ethnic identities, religious affiliations, and social ties that distinguish a group of individuals who live close to one another may be conceived of as weighted sums, I think that regional subcultures will become more unique over the next 20 years.
<h3>What purpose do subcultures serve?</h3>
Subcultures are crucial in helping people define their identities, feel a feeling of community, and think about how they fit into broader societal norms; nevertheless, they differ from widely accepted identity categories like ethnicity.
<h3>Is a certain region a subculture?</h3>
An area of the nation whose population share behavioral patterns that are different from those of the rest of the nation can be described as having a geographic subculture based on the description of a general subculture given above.
Learn more about subcultures: brainly.com/question/7243272
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: <span>legitimate power
</span><span>legitimate power refers to the power that derived from formal position in the organization, which make somebody who placed lower in the organizational hierarchy to have obligation to follow the order from someone that placed higher in the organizational hierarchy.</span>
Answer:One of the most hotly debated clauses in the Constitution deals with the removal of federal government officials through the impeachment process. But what did the Founders who crafted that language think about the process and its overall intention?
George MasonThe need for the ultimate check, and in particular the removal of the President, in a system of checks and balances was brought up early at the 1787 convention in Philadelphia. Constitutional heavyweights such as James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, James Wilson and Gouverneur Morris debated the Impeachment Clause at the convention, and Alexander Hamilton argued for it in The Federalist after the convention.
Today, impeachment remains as a rarely used process to potentially remove the “President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States” if Congress finds them guilty of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Explanation:
Alexis de tocqueville referred to the ability of the majority in a democracy to impose its will on everyone else as <u>"the tyranny of the majority".</u>
The idea of the tyranny of the majority was advanced by the nineteenth century political scholars Alexis de Tocqueville (Democracy in America) and John Stuart Mill (On Liberty). It alludes to a circumstance in which the greater part implements its will on a distraught minority through the equitable procedure. That is the thing that various minority bunches in the UK are encountering after Leave won the submission. Unexpectedly, this result has hurt the interests of the minority, as well as that of the dominant part that bolstered Brexit.
Akbar the great was the emperor of the Mugal Empire after his father died
