First set up the equation:
+
Now solve the ones in the parenthesis:
+
Then do the exponents:
25+64
The answer will be:<u> </u>
<u>89
</u>Hope this helps!
<u>
</u>
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Answer:
17 /6 t
Step-by-step explanation:
3t2+4t3
=32t+43t
Combine Like Terms:
=32t+43t
=(32t+43t)
=176t
