Answer:
The hypothetical-deductive method has several essential steps: observation of the phenomenon to be studied, creation of a hypothesis to explain said phenomenon, deduction of consequences or propositions more elementary than the hypothesis itself, and verification or verification of the truth of the deduced statements. .
Explanation:
<u>We could say that this method was very aptly applied in the case of children of children of the peace movement in Colombia, because first The situation or problem was observed and recognized ;</u>more than 140 student leaders formed a special council. They divided into various "commissions" to discuss different aspects of the conflict. There was a commission for the construction of peace, a commission for human rights, another for displaced persons, etc. They met in a large room, with each commission supported by one of the adults. For many of the students, the idea of being asked what they thought about war and how they could help peace was a revelation. An example of this was that of Farlis Calle, who was then fifteen years old and who later became a prominent leader in the National Movement for Children for Peace, asked why they did not teach peace education in Colombian schools. "How can we learn to be peaceful if our teachers don't help us understand what it means? No one here has lived in peace. We have been fighting from the moment we were born. "At the end of the two-day session, the various commissions had come up with many suggestions: for peace education, recreation projects, cultural events, and" a youth movement working for peace.
<u>After taking advantage of Machel's visit, Farlis Calle had been chosen by the students as the first child mayor of Apartad & oacute; and they believed that this gave them the constitutional right to form a local government of children. So here come the proposals and verification of results</u> by means of which notices were sent to the municipal schools, for others to know that they could and should participate in their government , and soon as many as 200 children attended peace meetings three times a week, gathering on soccer fields and parks.
One time I was lost in a place I didn't know. My phone is lagging so I can't use the map. I prayed to the Lord to help me. After a while, he answered my prayer and a passing car helped me out with the directions.
<span>Free trade areas (FTAs) are arrangements among two or more countries under which they agree to
eliminate tariffs and nontariff barriers on trade in goods among themselves. However, each
country maintains its own policies, including tariffs, on trade outside the region.
In the last few years, the United States has engaged or has proposed to engage in negotiations to
establish bilateral and regional free trade arrangements with a number of trading partners. Such
arrangements are not new in U.S. trade policy. The United States has had a free trade arrangement
with Israel since 1985 and with Canada since 1989, which was expanded to include Mexico and
became the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) effective in January 1994.</span>
Answer: Danielootello1Brainly Expert
The United States did not directly engage in battle.
In order to answer this you need previously to know that by a proxy war:
by definition:
is an armed conflict between two states which act on instigating third parties, usually setting terrain where hostilities take place. there must be a direct, long-term relationship between external actors and the belligerent groups involved.
Clearly there was no direct fighting between Soviet and American troops, still, the mujahedeen were economically assisted and tactically aided by Us officers whereas, to the counterpart, the communist local government that was supporting assistance from the Soviet side also was given financial and military assistance. In this ideological confrontations, the external powers do not engage in open and direct warfare, rather, the intermediate or states in between are the terrain for the war to be carried.
Explanation: