John D Rockefeller would be the answer you're looking for :)
Answer:
oo much interference by other countries:
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT- The overseas countries with a strong manufacturing / industrial base would prefer to keep you as a commodity provider and buyer of their finished goods only .eg. If you are buying USD$Billions worth of arms and ammunition from overseas countries, it is not in their interest that you develop a strong/independent defense manufacturing capability. They achieve this by further corrupting decision makers and rulers in strict violation of their own Anti - Corruption laws. Writer Dr. Shashi Tharoor’s essay “Inglorious Empire” delves into these aspects somewhat in India’s context.
RELIGIO-POLITICAL - A more detailed examination in the context of India by Arvind Kumar - Global Economic Theories - A Ploy To Loot India | Arvind Kumar | History Of Economic Systems
ECONOMIC & SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT - By fomenting discord using funds channelled via Religious, social or NGO’s to those who will push the respective agendas of overseas countries. Writer John Perkins writes and speaks about this extensively in “Confessions of an Economic Hitman” . New Confessions of an Economic Hitman
GLOBAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES - Some of the far out /wilder allegations are from British writers such as David Icke about various secret societies, apparently with disproportionate control over human destiny. David Icke Reveals Who Controls the World!
DEFINITION OF “DEVELOPMENT” MAY BE DIFFERENT - Despite the existence of metrics like the HDI by globalist agenda organisations/NGO’s. The environmental collapse of the world and non-human species of plants and animals proves that the HDI is “insufficient” for the world. Therefore a country like Bhutan decided that their main metric for “development” was not to create concrete and glass soul-less cities, destruction of families such that most people over 40 live alone with a dog or cat for company and a dog-eat-dog society mainly focused on GDP. They choose GHI (Gross Happiness Index), clean air, forests and food uncontaminated by chemicals. Who is to say that their choices are worse than so called “developed” countries??
T made political and economic sense for some to do so.
Explanation:
First off, not all Native Americans supported the French during the colonial wars. Most Algonquian speakers supported the French and most Iroquois supported the English. In general, the key concepts here are economic power and political power.
The fur trade dominated colonial relations from the Ohio Valley and the Upper Midwest. Whoever controlled the economy of that area would have both economic and political power. The Iroquois were positioned to control trade via the Great Lakes. Algonquian speakers were able to go around them and deal directly with Europeans. Iroquois leaders attempted to push into the interior using British guns while Algonquians pushed the Lakota out of Minnesota and onto the plains.
Many Algonquians intermarried with the French and created a new ethnic group, the Metis who also aligned with the French, in part, because both were Catholic.
The answer to this question is: Valid
For example, let's say that a researcher wants to study the psychology of motivation as a variable.
In this case, motivation does not possess a measurable standard that could be used as data, so the researcher could only predict thte amount of motivation through the amount of job done (but this data is reliable because motivation is only on of the many factors that may influenced it)
bacon: inductive reasoning
copernicus: developed heliocentric theory
newton: developed laws of gravity
galileo: used math to develop helio theory
kepler: built is own telescope
descartes: believed he existed becuase he could question
