Answer:
D
Explanation:
The law of supply states that when the price of an object rises, so does the quantity supplied. If the ketchups prices rise, so will the quantity that is supplied making this an example of the law of supply.
Rosario seeking information that confirms her decision was a good decision while she ignores conflicting information, is an example of: confirmation bias.
<h3>What is a confirmation bias?</h3>
A confirmation bias can be defined as the tendency of an individual to search, favor and recall information in such a way that it's consistent, supports and favors one's existing beliefs and decisions.
In this context, an example of confirmation bias would be Rosario seeking information that confirms her decision was a good decision while she ignores conflicting information.
Read more on decisions here: brainly.com/question/1249089
<span>Sweatshop is a insulting term for a workplace that has poor, socially unworkable working conditions. The work may be hard, dangerous, or u wont make enough money.</span>
Answer:
$1,500
Explanation:
Domestic investment = $1500 billion
Private domestic savings = $3000 billion
Government deficit = $2000 billion
Rise in government spending = $1000 billion
Now,
Trade deficit =
Domestic investment - Private domestic saving - Government savings
also,
Total Government deficits = $2,000 + $1000
= $3,000
and,
Government savings = - Government deficits
= - $3,000
Now we know government deficit is 3000 billion and if spending increases further 1000 billion, the government deficit will be 4000 billion
thus,
Trade deficit = $1,500 - $3,000 - (- $3,000)
or
= $1,500
Answer:
There would be NO IMPACT
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about, rialto company collected $5,000 on account. In this case there will be no impact of this transaction on the firm's current ratio. The collection on account can be regarded as exchange of asset transaction, any increase change in current asset account cash, then there will be decreases in Accounts Receivable , the ration of current asset to current liabilities gives the current ratio, there is no impact of transaction on the current ratio, since the transaction doesn't affect both the
current asset to current liabilities
