All categories

3 years ago

What might have happened if the founding fathers had accepted the Articles of Confederation?

Social Studies

1 answer:

monitta3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The following might have happened if the Founding Fathers had accepted the Articles of Confederation:

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was the first governing document of the United States. This document did not provide enough powers and authority to the central government. Moreover, the lack of a national army, national currency, national laws weakened the national government. As a result of this, a strong federal government was required. Consequently, a new Constitution was prepared for the United States.

The following might have happened if the Founding Fathers had accepted the Articles of Confederation:

Various other countries would have attacked the states of the United States.
The outsiders would have established their autocracy in the states of the U.S. in lack of the national government and national army.
The states themselves would have tried to establish their control over each other to enlarge their territories.

You might be interested in

¿Cómo explicas la contradicción existente, en que según Estados Unidos es un pueblo

Wewaii [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

¿cómo explicas la contradicción de que según los Estados Unidos es un pueblo elegido por Dios y al mismo tiempo apoyas la institución de la esclavitud?

La respuesta es; Con el tiempo, la conexión que los europeos hicieron entre el pecado, la esclavitud, el color de la piel y las creencias condenaría a los africanos. En la Biblia, la esclavitud física o espiritual es a menudo una consecuencia de acciones pecaminosas, mientras que la oscuridad se asocia con el mal.

5 0

3 years ago

According to Taiaiake Alfred and Jeff Corntassel's Reflection article "Being Indigenous: Resurgences against Contemporary Coloni

iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

Explanation:

Alfred and Corntassel write about contemporary colonial practices and it's various forms through time.

The idea of the colonial system, in general, is gaining control over a group of people and their land, but in the contemporary frame and postmodern colonial system, it has been much more subtilized.

Earlier forms of colonialism are remembered in history by aggressive militaristic attacks, forcible missionaries and educations, removal of children, land confiscation and various other forms of compulsive, sometimes violent, forms of domination.

Recent years have shown rise of the subtle, but persistent Imperialistic practices of postmodern colonialism.

This means that Indigenous peoples have been removed from state's frameworks, while being under the pressure of the general political, legal and cultural norms that do not suit them, and which do not apply for them, their life, tradition, and learnings. With this, the right of self-determination is hurt, as well as their citizenship standards.

3 0

3 years ago

How do short-term goals differ from long-term goals?

SVEN [57.7K]

The following statement describes the difference between short-term goals and long-term goals :

Short-term goals are more immediate than long-term goals. Short-term goals are plans for the near future. Long-term goals on the other hand plans for further in the future

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Carl has a problem. he has been getting c's and lower grades on his tests and assignments all term. what is a question he could

jolli1 [7]

In the situation in which Carl has been getting C's and lower grades on his tests and assignments all term he should ask himself the question:
If his study habits are effective? Answering this question will help him to identify the cause of his poor grades. Maybe he isn't studying the way he should do.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Reducing Ocean Plastics and Marine Debris.

ale4655 [162]

Answer:

no question

Explanation:

what is your question??

7 0

2 years ago