Number 6 I need help

Mathematics

1 answer:

andrey2020 [161]3 years ago

3 0

Double check my answer and try to work it out, but this is what I did..

139 divided by 10 is 13.9, so about 14. so about 14 groups of 10.

so if they made 14 groups of their ten dollars, then the local business will contribute 50% of the 10 dollars made (5 dollars) for every time it is sold/gained.

so you will end up with 14 x 5=70. 70+139=209, which is less than 240.

So the answer is NO, it is not reasonable that they will end up with 240 total after the contributions made by raising 139 dollars worth of money.

You might be interested in

A 1:35 scale model of a fishing hut is 17 cm tall, 18 cm wide, and 19.7 cm long. What are the dimensions of the actual ice fishi

konstantin123 [22]

Multiply each dimension by 35:-

17*35 = 595 cm

18*35 = 630 cm

19.7 * 35 = 689.5 cm

in meters the dimensions are L = 6.895 m, W = 6.3 m and H = 5.95 m

6 0

3 years ago

Heeelp will give brainliest

ozzi

Answer:

42*7

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Consuela and her three friends order 2 pizzas. Consuela cuts each pizza into 8 equal slices. She saves 2 slices of pizza for her

Akimi4 [234]

Let
x--------------> the number of slices eating by Consuela and her three friends

we know that
[total slices]=8*2=16 slices
[slices of pizza for her older brother]=2
x=16-2=14 slides
Consuela and her friends share the rest of the pizza, each eating the same number of slices---------> 14/4= 3.5 slides of pizza each (this part is not necessary, but it is shown in a didactic way)

the question is
What fraction of the 2 pizzas is left over?
[slices of pizza for her older brother]/[total slices]=2/16=1/8

the answer is (1/8)

8 0

3 years ago

The scale of a map says 4 cm represents 5 km. What distance on the map in cm represents an actual distance of 4 km

Vilka [71]

4cm : 5km

xcm : 4km

Cross multiply.

4 * 4 = 16

5 * x = 5x

5x = 16

x = 16/5

x = 3.2km

3.2km : 4km

5 0

3 years ago

Why does the efficient market hypothesis reduce the demand for financial advisors?

ollegr [7]

Part of a financial advisor's job is to allocate money in the best available asset or security (eg: stocks and bonds). So they look at market data and use mathematical models to help judge on where to put money. Their goal is to so called "beat the market", meaning they want to earn the best return compared to other players in the market. Doing so will allow them to "buy low, sell high" which is a common cliche in finance. Though it's a very good rule to follow of course.

The efficient market hypothesis says that whatever the stock price is currently, it reflects everything about that company. In other words, there are no hidden facts that may surprise investors to drastically change the price of the stock. All information is completely transparent. What this means is that anyone can determine where to put their money without the need for a financial advisor.

I don't think demand would be completely wiped out since even if in a 100% transparent environment, people would still prefer to have others manage their money or not want to deal with complicated math formulas. However, demand would be reduced to some degree. In reality, there are always hidden factors that don't fully contribute to the cost of a security, which is why the efficient market hypothesis isn't fully applicable in every situation. So this is likely why financial advisors are in demand and are paid well.

7 0

3 years ago