Answer:
(d) 15 bouquets
Explanation:
it is given that kate alone can arrange 20 bouquets per day
and it is also given that when Kate and his husband William work together then they arrange 35 bouquets
we have to find the William marginal product
if both together arrange 35 bouquets and Kate alone arrange 20 bouquets it means that 35-20=15 bouquets are arranged by William alone
so the marginal product of William is 35-20=15 so the option will be the correct answer
N.B: I don't understand your question fully and neither can i find the complete question anywhere on the internet so im going to answer this sentence and hope it helps you.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
When a company has employees from different backgrounds and with different skills set, it helps the company come up with a lot of innovations that cuts across different cultures, thereby expanding their own range of services and/or goods. Also it helps in problem solving as each employee can come to the table with various ways of solving a problem.
This situation can be called diversity of thoughts.
Cheers.
Answer:
The correct answer is "startling statement"
Explanation:
A startling statement is an exponential declaration, that nobody expected and leaves everyone who hears, surprised.
The first step ....................................... is to develop and publicize A SOCIAL MEDIA policy.
A social media policy refers to a corporate code of conduct which provides guidelines for the workers of a company who post contents on the internet either in their official or private capacity. It is also called social networking policy.
Answer:
(b.) Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor
Explanation:
Under the Rules of the court Josh's action is referred to as Default of Appearance. Isabel is the Complainant while Josh is the Defendant.
It is the law that where a Defendant fails to appear before the court where there is a proof of service of the summons on him or her, Complainant may apply to the Judge for a judgement in respect of the claim on the summons to be entered in his or her favor against the Defendant.
Therefore, in the instance case at hand, Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor for failure of Josh to appear before the court.
Option (a) is not the answer because Isabel does not need to file an amended complaint because Isabel did not ask the court for any amendment of her complaint. Isabel can only file an amended complaint if she intends to change her complaint against Josh.
Option (c) is not also the answer because Josh chooses to ignore the summons served on him. If for instance Josh did not get the summons served on him or the judge is of the opinion that Josh was not properly served, then the court can order that Josh must be served with a second summons.
Option (d) is also not the answer because Josh cannot have a judgment entered in his favor because he is the person who defaulted appearance before the court. A party who is in default of appearance cannot have judgment entered in his favor.
