Answer:
a) DuPont analysis for Johnson International
2013: 0.059 x 2.11 x 1.75 = 0.2179 = 21.79%
2014: 0.058 x 2.18 x 1.75 = 0.2213 = 22.13%
2015: 0.049 x 2.34 x 1.85 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
b) DuPont analysis for industry averages
2013: 0.054 x 2.05 x 1.67 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
2014: 0.047 x 2.13 x 1.69 = 0.1692 = 16.92%
2015: 0.041 x 2.15 x 1.64 = 0.1446 = 14.46%
c) Johnson International's drivers follow the same tendency as the industry's average, e.g. net profit margin decreased in a similar manner, and total asset turnover increased also in a similar manner to the industry's average. The only driver that doesn't follow the industry's trend is financial leverage. While other companies in the same industry decreased their financial leverage, Johnson increased it. You should further analyze why this happened and what are the potential consequences.
Explanation:
The DuPont analysis is used to break down ROE into 3 different components and that way you can analyze whether a company's high ROE comes along with a high risk. The following formula is used to calculate ROE based on 3 different factors:
R
OE = net pro
fit margin x total assets turnover x financial leverage
Answer:
<u>Zone of tolerance</u>
Explanation:
Zone of tolerance with respect to a service refers to, the acceptable range to a customer, that lies between the perceived desired level of service expected and the minimum level of service acceptable.
The service which the customer anticipates or expects to be delivered by a firm is referred to as predicted service.
Customer expectations do not depict a single level of expectation, rather they follows a range of expectations. This range is represented as zone of tolerance.
If the service received lies in the zone of tolerance, the customer would be satisfied. If it is higher than the desired level, the customer would consider it exceptional.
In case the service received falls below the minimum level of acceptance, the customer would be disappointed and feel deceived or tricked.
Answer:
it depends how many months you want so no is not
Answer:
Total cash collection June= $98,500
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
25% in month of sale
65% in month following sale
5% in second month following sale
5% uncollectible
The following sales have been budgeted:
Sales
April $120,000
May $100,000
June $110,000
<u>Cash collection June:</u>
Cash collection from June= 110,000*0.25= 27,500
Cash collection from May= 100,000*0.65= 65,000
Cash collection from April= 120,000*0.05= 6,000
Total cash collection June= $98,500