Answer: A, B, D, F
A “deciding whether laws were unfair”
B “talking with local officials”
D “Holding peaceful protests for change”
F “Learning how to protest in a nonviolent way”
Explanation:
I hope this helps ^^
Answer:
Magnitude of Consequences
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various behaviorists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Deborah feels the Magnitude of Consequences is too great. This is formally defined as the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision. Which is what Deborah is weighing when thinking about this potential decision to cheat.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
It is the knowingly act of falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth or giving a false statement under oath, wether be spoken or written when that affirmation can influence the legal result of an official proceeding, this is also know as PERJURY, this is different from false swearing because in this case, this is not an oath required by law, is made voluntarily, and its purpose is not necessarily to influence or mislead anyone.
The correct answer is substance-related
Explanation: Substance-related disorders involve drugs that directly activate the brain's reward system. Activation of the reward system usually causes feelings of pleasure; The specific pleasure sensations evoked vary widely, depending on the drug. These drugs are divided into 10 different classes that have different but not completely different pharmacological mechanisms.
Answer:
it's integumentary system
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
