1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gennadij [26K]
4 years ago
5

What are two basic differences between DNA and RNA? RNA is usually single stranded, while DNA is usually double stranded. RNA co

ntains uracil, while DNA contains thymine. RNA is usually double stranded, while DNA is usually single stranded. RNA contains thymine, while DNA contains uracil. RNA doesn’t contain cytosine, while DNA doesn’t contain adenine.
Biology
2 answers:
LiRa [457]4 years ago
8 0
<span> Both of them are nucleic acids. And that is about the only similarity they share. ;)

One of the major differences between the two is that DNA is double-stranded and RNA is single stranded. Also, DNA contains the nucleotide T whereas RNA contains U.

RNA copies the genetic information found within DNA and uses it to assemble protein, as well as ribosomes. Hence, RNA is a crucial part in protein synthesis, being directly involved in it, whereas DNA is indirectly involved in this process.

There are three types of RNA: mRNA (messenger RNA), rRNA (ribosomal RNA) and tRNA (transfer RNA). As far as DNA is concerned, there is only one type of DNA. ;) Another difference.

Also, in some viruses the RNA replaces the DNA but the DNA will never replace the RNA. Yet another difference. </span>
Marizza181 [45]4 years ago
5 0

A & B on Plato if thats what youre looking for

You might be interested in
Which maps is an example of a Mercator projection?
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

As on all map projections, shapes or sizes are distortions of the true layout of the Earth's surface. The Mercator projection exaggerates areas far from the equator. For example: Greenland appears the same size as Africa, when in reality Africa's area is 14 times greater.

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Enzymes are carbohydrates true or false?
Masteriza [31]
False. Although enzymes work as catalyst, they are not carbohydrates, they are proteins.
8 0
3 years ago
How much force is needed to lift something with a mass of 1kg
goblinko [34]

Answer:

Lets be clear, in an inertial frame of reference it will take 1 newton to move 1 kilogram 1 meter in one second(roughly). 1 joule in that newton, 1/speed of light = incremental mass increase( irrelevant) . So, to move 1 kg of mass 1 meter in 0.00000003 seconds would take 300,000,000 joules(fun).

That divided by speed of light again and your 1kg mass is now 2 kg. Now to move 2 kg 1 meter would take more energy than previously. More energy (newtons) the more relativistic mass gained and thus more energy required to move faster. This is why we cant reach the speed of light - infinite energy. ( again irrelevent to the Question).

But in your question you said lift. Lift is a term that I would find on earth, in a gravity well, so moving that same 1kg of mass wouldn't take 1 newton because the gravitational force pulls the mass down, causing a force called weight - this would be 9.8 N x Mass at sea level. So to lift this 1kg mass will take more than 9.8 N. 10 newtons of life would create a net force of 0.2 N so 0.2/1 = 0.2 meters acceleration.

Note that, gravitational force is one side of the same coin, with acceleration on the other. We talk of gravitation in terms of acceleration, as two masses that are not identical will always fall at the same acceleration. Gravity isn't a force, its a four dimensional field that curves linear paths toward attracting bodies - this is how we are able to orbit objects in space.

4 0
3 years ago
What is all matter made of? A. bonds B. cells C. electrons D. atoms
natima [27]
Matter is made of atoms. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Using technology, scientists are now able to use genetic information to classify new species. What is the likely impact of this
DanielleElmas [232]

The answer is <em><u>not</u></em> Organisms would be classified based only on physical characteristics!!

I strongly feel that it would be....

<em>--the existing classification system may change to accommodate the new information.--</em>

<em>Reason:</em> Some things would not just be classified by appearance. Rather, this would add more possibilities to classification. We know that plants and dogs look nothing alike yet they are still related through the Domain (Eukarya).

I also took this test and relied on the other answer, sadly, it was incorrect.

I hope i could help! Let me know if this is incorrect. ~ Ninja Cat :D

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • All cells, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic, have all of the following except: A. cytoplasm B. DNA C. mitochondria D. ribosomes
    15·1 answer
  • Anders has just received devastating news about the coffee shop he owns. Things seem very bleak because a nationally known compe
    15·1 answer
  • A person who is highly tolerant to _____ creates problems for anesthesiologists in surgery.
    5·1 answer
  • Need some help please!!?
    10·1 answer
  • how does water role in photosynthesis explain increased biological productivity in area of heavy precipitation​
    7·1 answer
  • In hemoglobin Rainier, Tyr 145β is replaced by Cys, which forms a disulfide bond with another Cys residue in the same subunit. T
    7·1 answer
  • Pictures that we receive from space are of the present past future because it takes time for sound light heat to reach Earth.
    11·1 answer
  • What is not considered to be science
    13·1 answer
  • If energy is needed to remove a phosphate group from a chain in ATP you can conclude that the energy needed for production must
    7·1 answer
  • How long a typical red blood cell (blood, in general at the blood bank) lasts or is good for?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!