By using trigonometric relations, we will see that the angle of elevation must be 55°.
<h3>
How to find the angle of elevation?</h3>
We can see this as a right triangle, where one cathetus measures 1250ft (altitude) and the other cathetus measures 875ft.
The angle of elevation is the angle such that the adjacent cathetus is the one measuring 875ft.
Then we can use the relation:
tan(a) = (opposite cathetus)/(adjacent cathetus)
tan(a) = 1250ft/875ft
To find the angle of elevation, we can use the inverse tangent function:
a = Atan(1250ft/875ft) = 55°
The angle of elevation must be 55 degrees.
If you want to learn more about right triangles:
brainly.com/question/2217700
#SPJ1
I'm pretty sure they are all correct
Answer: No, the data provided is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean height of women in the city differs from the national mean.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that

Mean height = 61.5 inches
Standard deviation = 4.4 inches
n = 100
So, test statistic value would be

At 10% level of significance, in two tail test ,
z = 1.28
Since 1.28 > -2.727
So, we will accept the null hypothesis.
Hence, No, the data provided is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean height of women in the city differs from the national mean.
An arithmetic sequence would have a common difference between successive terms, not the case here.
A geometric sequence has a common ratio; let's check:



That's a common ratio of 3 so as far as we can tell a geometric sequence.
Answer: geometric