Answer:
A 2.9% pay increase in 2014 for U.S. workers will cause the AS (aggregate supply) curve to shift inward in the short-run, signaling a decline in the quantity supplied.
Explanation:
The supply quantity declines because a pay increase increases suppliers' cost of production and reduces their ability to produce more goods and services. On the contrary, a fall in workers' pay causes the aggregate supply curve to shift outward, thereby increasing the quantity supplied. In the long-run, the pay increase will increase aggregate demand, thereby pushing prices to increase, while, at the same, suppliers try to increase the quantity supplied to meet with increased prices and demand.
This type of flexible work arrangement is known as SHIFT.
In shift arrangement, the hours in the days are often divided equally into night and day sections, which are handle by different employees. Sometimes, a day work may be divided into three shift depending on the policies of the concerned company.
Answer: E. The firm's ability to differentiate its product
Explanation:
The factor under the control of owners and managers that make a firm successful and allow it to earn economic profits is the firm's ability to differentiate its product.
Product Differentiation has to do with making a product unique from that of its rivals so that it'll be attractive to the customers and the target market. This will slow be vital for the company to produce at a average cost that is lower than that of its competing firms. This will help the company to have a competitive edge over others.
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
c) 48,000
Explanation:
<em>Equivalent Units</em>
To apportion cost between work in progress and completed units in a particular period, we use equivalent units. Equivalents units are notional whole units which represent incomplete work and are used to apportion cost between completed units and work in progress
<em>Equivalent Units = Degree of Completion × Units of products</em>
<em />
<em>Item units workings E.U</em>
Finished products 45,000 100% × 45,000 = 45,000
Closing WIP 5000 3/5 × 5000 = 3,000
Total equivalent unit 48,000
Equivalent unit for the conversion cost= 45000 +3000= 48,000
