Answer:
the gain on retirement bond is $100,000
Explanation:
The computation of the gain or loss recognized on the bond retirement is shown below;
= Book value - paid at redemption
= ($1,500,000 + $157,500) - ($1,500,000 × 105%)
= ($1,657,500) - ($1,575,000)
= $100,000
hence, the gain on retirement bond is $100,000
The same is to be considered and relevant too
Answer: $40,000
Explanation:
The maximum amount of additional money that Carland National Bank can create will be calculated as the difference between the total reserve and the excess reserve. This will be:
= Total reserve – required reserve
where,
Total reserve = $60,000
Required reserve = 200000 × 10%
= 200,000 × 0.1
= $20,000
Therefore,
Excess reserve = $60000 - $20000
Excess reserve = $40000
Answer
$400
Step by step explanation
Step 1: Total of the three deal = $40,000
Commission = 1% = 1/100 = 0.01
Step 2: Find the commission for $40,000
Commission earned for the month = 0.01 *$40000
= $400
I hope you will understand this.
Thank you.
<u>Answer: </u>$500,000
<u>Explanation:</u>
The difference between the contract amount and cost incurred is the profit in this case.
Profit from the project = $20mn-$16mn
=$4mn
In the above mentioned project only 12.5% complete at the end of 20X5 ($2mn/$16mn). Total gross profit through the end of 20X5 is therefore
=$4mn x 12.5%
=$500,000
The $500,000 amount is the proportion of completion applied to the total contract profit of $4mn. This is the beginning year of contract so there is no previous profits or expenses that needs to be adjusted. The entire $500,000 gross profit is recognized in 20X5.
Question: The question is incomplete. See the full question below and the answer.
You are an up-and-coming developer in downtown Seattle and are interested in constructing a building on a site you own. You have collected four bids from prospective contractors. The bids include both a cost ($millions) and time to completion (months):
Contractor Cost Time
A 100 20
B 80 25
C 79 28
D 82 26
The problem now is to decide which contractor to choose. B has indicated that for another $20 million, he could do the job in 18 months, and you have said that you would be indifferent between that bid and the original proposal. In talking with C, you have indicated that you would just as soon pay her an extra $million if she could get the job done in 26 months. Who gets the job? Explain your reasoning. (It may be convenient to plot the four alternatives on a graph.)
Answer:
See the explanation for the answer and find attached of the graph.
Explanation:
So we draw a regression line of Time vs Cost and best fit a curve based on the data given, given in the above figure. The four alternatives are marked in the figure as well. Our main objective is to reduce both time and cost, but that might not be possible So the best thing would be to look for alternatives which lie below the line. If C gets an extra million, then that point would come below the regression line, and it would be a better alternative than D, because for the same time we are getting the job done at a cheaper cost.
Also if B is paid extra 20 million, that point also comes below the regression line, and hence will be a better alternative than A because for the same cost again we are getting the job done earlier. We need to choose between B and C. Now in order to optimise both cost and time, we need to choose a point close to the middle point of the regression line segment in 1st quadrant. We see that C is much more closer to the middle point and hence seems like a better option.
So we choose C as our contractor if we consider B's alternative bid, but if we do not consider B's alternative bid and stick to the original one, we choose B as our contractor.