The Hardy-Weinberg equation is as follows:


Where:
(convert all % to decimals)
p= homozygous dominant
q= homozygous recessive
pq= heterozygous
While you did not specify whether the 0.2 frequency was for dominant or recessive, we can still figure out the answer.
Using the 1st equation, we can solve for the other dominant/recessive frequency:
1-0.2=0.8
Meaning that:
p= 0.8 & q=0.2
If the heterozygouz frequency is 2pq, then it becomes a simple "plug & chug" sort of approach.
2(0.8)(0.2)= 2(0.16)= 0.32
So, the heterozygous frequency would be:
0.32
Hope this helps!
It is an advantage because they approach their environments from all sides equally.
The correct answer is C. Here's why:
Choice A is illogical. A single experiment does not confirm a theory as true. Multiple successful trials are needed for one to even consider a hypothesis to be accepted as a theory.
Choice B is wrong. If a scientist finds a new way to test a hypothesis, experimental methods do change. Note that when there are additional ways to test a hypothesis, a scientist should test it with additional methods.
Choice D is incorrect. If someone finds a way to test a new hypothesis, it would not be made into law since there is more information regarding the theory. This means that it would remain a theory until one can prove that it can't be tested using different methods.
C is the answer
:) for your question (im writing extra cause answer is too small)
Any options, Alissamariee?