Answer:
the wording is kinda wierd but I would say B because the mandate systems purpose was the stop the cycle of war by splitting up germany and the ottoman empires land in africa and asia
Countries that have "free-market" economy generally have better standards of living. It is an economy whereas it is dependent of supplies and demands. By no meaning it has no controls within the government.
The city-states along the eastern coast of Africa made ideal centers of trade. As trade intensified between Africa and Asia, prosperous city-states flourished along the eastern coast of Africa. <span>The city-states traded with inland kingdoms like Great Zimbabwe to obtain gold, ivory, and iron. These materials were then sold to places like India, Southeast Asia, and </span>China<span>. These were Africa’s exports in the Indian Ocean Trade. These items could be sold at a profit because they were scarce in Asian countries.</span>
The Aztecs demanded that a tribute in goods be paid to them, after they conquered a specific land. As long as the tribute was paid (which ensured their financial position), it was beneficial for them if the conquered people didn't revolt (too much), and if they didn't need to extend funds and infrastructure to govern them- that way they could pay little and maximize their gain. It was practical to reinstall the old rulers in the conquered lands, if they were sure of their loyalty, as it would minimize conflict and need for intervention (such as sending a lot of people into the new land) and maximize their profit.
With rivers, cities grew with receiving enough resources from the rivers like water and fish for survival. With rivers, they can ride to different cities and trade. Rivers are a very important part of nature. They can give you so many resources for survival.
