Herbert Hoover, although flawed in many ways and disliked by many, he did great work to repair damage in Europe following World War I, and brought thousands of US troops home.
The universe is beyond our human being's imagination. Modern Technology can keep exploring the Solar system but it will not be able to gather all information about the Solar system. Therefore, the given statement is false.
<h3>How Technology has developed over time?</h3>
Today, lots of our innovations are centered on growing quicker approaches to speaking with every other, and withinside the process, we are growing extra facts than human beings can comprehend.
Now, a brand new tool, synthetic intelligence, is rising on the nexus of all this.
Therefore, the given statement is false.
Learn more about Technology here:
brainly.com/question/25110079
#SPJ1
Answer:
Impaired health or death
Ccyhj
Death
Explanation:
Water pollution may be explained as the discharge of harmful wastes into water bodies, these waste may be human waste such as sewage, and other household waste which are disposed into water bodies. A large part of waste which causes pollution to water bodies come from Industrial discharge. Polluted water has a direct and adverse effects on humans, which include ;
Spread of diseases : Water bodies provides means of water for various purposes including drinking and domestic use ; §the use of contaminated water for these purpose will no doubt have a great effect in the lives which could be typhoid, cancer, skin or liver diseases depending on the type of contaminant.
Destruction of sea lives leading to economic effect :With the introduction of chemicals or oil spills, which are main sources of contaminant. However, there are citizens who depend on sea lives such as fishes, crab for their livelihood are greatly affected as numerous sea animals die from pollution.
There are several reasons why group problem-solving and decision making is more likely to produce the correct answer than in an individual setting.
One reason is that groups who act in a cooperative manner tend to do better than individuals, who are in a more competitive atmosphere. Group interaction facilitates collaboration, fresh ideas, and improved solutions.
Another reason why groups tend to do better is that a group has a better collective memory than one person does.
Lastly, a group working together can draw upon each other's strengths and talents, making the group more well-rounded and resource rich.
I agree with these perspectives on the grounds that there are a few situations where an individual planned to follow up on a good aim however the result wasn't right and here and there an individual expect to act awful after something and the activity ended up being great. My point is that occasionally unexpected things can happen and cause a change to a condition that we have no power in. I trust that an individual ought to be judged in light of their expectations, not their activities.
