1) c= 3.5cm × 22/7
c= 77cm/7 = 11cm
2) c= 2×3.14×5cm
= 6.28× 5cm
=31.4cm
3) L=180/360 × 22/7 × 3cm
= 1/2 × 22/7 ×3cm
=4.71 cm
4) c=12cm ×3.14
=37.68cm
5) c = 4.5cm × 3.14
=14.13cm
6) c = 6.7cm × 3.14
= 21.038cm
I am pretty sure it is 50 by 64 centimeters but if it is not I am really sory for the mistake.
You might be thinking of "distribution" or "distributive property"
Example:
2(3x+5) = 2*3x+2*5 = 6x+10
I multiplied the outer 2 by each term inside (3x and 5)
Answer: D, or 1+cotangent squared theta= cosecant squared theta
Step-by-step explanation: Took the test it is right
Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1
