I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.
<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>
This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.
It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.
Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
Congress is authorized to regulate interstate commerce under the U.S. Constitution. This means that travel between the states is subject to several federal laws and regulations. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is the umbrella agency for all federal transportation policies and regulations. A is the correct answer
Answer: <em>Social dumping</em>
Explanation:
<em>Social dumping</em> is employers ' method of using cheaper labor than is usually available at their production or sales site. In the latter case, it hires migrant workers; in the former, it transfers production to a low-wage country or area. Therefore, the company will save money and potentially increase its profit. Systemic analysis indicates that governments are therefore forced to participate in a so-called social policy system by increasing their labor and social standards in order to ease labor costs for businesses and maintain business activity within their jurisdiction.
<em>Entities derived from social dumping: </em>
- companies in importing countries
- Participants in importing countries
- Customers in importing countries
- Industry in importing markets
- Employment in exporting countries
- Government and investment in exporting countries
In most cases, yes, they can’t let their emotions blind them from what has to be done, if they be bias then they could be fired or that one person could commit another crime. That’s why police are so cold.
Hope this clears things up
✨SammySilkWorm waz here✨
