Answer:
Step-by-shwowbfizbaasldkt fbdisjs r fbfjep explanation:
Part (a)
There are 7 red out of 7+3 = 10 total
<h3>Answer: 7/10</h3>
==========================================================
Part (b)
We have 3 green out of 10 total
<h3>Answer: 3/10</h3>
==========================================================
Part (c)
3/10 is the probability of getting green on any selection. This is because we put the first selection back (or it is replaced with an identical copy)
So (3/10)*(3/10) = 9/100 is the probability of getting two green in a row.
<h3>Answer: 9/100</h3>
==========================================================
Part (d)
Similar to part (c) we have 7/10 as the probability of getting red on each independent selection.
(7/10)*(7/10) = 49/100
<h3>Answer: 49/100</h3>
==========================================================
Part (e)
7/10 is the probability of getting red and 3/10 is the probability of getting green. Each selection is independent of any others.
(7/10)*(3/10) = 21/100
<h3>Answer: 21/100</h3>
==========================================================
Part (f)
We have the exact same set up as part (e). Notice how (7/10)*(3/10) is the same as (3/10)*(7/10).
<h3>Answer: 21/100</h3>
Answer:
1 x 60, 2 x 30, 3 x 20, 4 x 15, 5 x 12, 6 x 10, 10 x 6, 12 x 5, 15 x 4, 20 x 3, 30 x 2, 60 x 1 = 60
Step-by-step explanation:
43.305 or in Mixed Number is 43 61/200 or in improper Fraction is 8661/200
Answer:
B. 64.9
Step-by-step explanation:
A graphing calculator or spreadsheet can fit these points with an exponential curve. An appropriate answer for x=14 is about 73.3.
_____
<em>Comment on the answer choices</em>
The closest answer that makes any sense is 64.9. Often these problems are worked by someone who uses inappropriate rounding of intermediate results. I haven't found the magic set of numbers to get 64.9. About the lowest I can get is 66.7, using 0.0037·e^(0.7x).
