The answer is 9 because if you find the two side lengths and find the area of the square then divide it by 2 it equals 9
New cordinates are formed by adding 7 in x and subtracting 2 from y
A(−2, 2) =A ' (-2 +7 , 2 - 1 ) = A' (5,1)
B(−2, 4) = B' (-2 + 7 , 4 -1 )= B' (5,3)
C(2, 4) = C' (2 + 7 , 4 -1 )= C' (9,3)
<span>D(2, 2) D' (2 + 7 , 2 -1 ) = D' ( 9 , 1)</span><span>
</span>
Theoretical probability:
1 ... (16 and 2/3) %
2 ... (16 and 2/3) %
3 ... (16 and 2/3) %
4 ... (16 and 2/3) %
5 ... (16 and 2/3) %
6 ... (16 and 2/3) %
Experimental results:
1 ... 18
2 ... 16
3 ... 16
4 ... 17
5 ... 16
6 ... 17
The total number of rolls in the experiment was
(18 + 16 + 16 + 17 + 16 + 17) = 100
so the expected frequency for each outcome was 16-2/3 times,
and the SIMULATION probabilities were
1 ... 18%
2 ... 16%
3 ... 16%
4 ... 17%
5 ... 16%
6 ... 17%
To me, this looks fantastically close. The cube
could hardly be more fair than it actually is.
Answer:
6mm
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
First n(AUB)=n(E) - n((AUB)')
So n(AUB) = 40 - 6 = 34
Now all u hv to do is use the formulae,
n(AUB) = n(A) + n(B) - n(ANB)
So when u substitute above values,
34=22 + n(B) - 8
So,
n(B) = 4
