<span>The fourth amendment. They illegally went into her home and took her possessions.</span>
Answer:
The Age of Absolutism refers to period in French history where the Monarch has Absolute power over the country and all it's resources.
Explanation:
An example is that of Napoleon Bonaparte or Louis the 16th. As absolute Monarchy, there were increases in taxation to not only help build a powerful army but also to fund the lavish lifestyles of these kings.
A king would also influence the local religion and social customs that would sometimes out them in odds with other religiously motivated monarchs in Europe.
As tensions grew and the government expenditure grew even larger, a war and territorial gain would be seen as the best way to not only increase power but eventually generate more revenue.
This was in stark contrast to smaller countries in Europe, especially modern-day Belgium or Germany where the power of the King was gradually decreasing.
They could neither build an army as big as France's and did not have the will to do so.
Hence, during this time, the French were able to annex millions of acres of new land and build the largest territorial Empire in Europe.
Answer:
B. Oliver is automatically a U.S. Citizen due to the Law of Blood.
Explanation:
Given that both Oliver's parents became naturalized American citizens before Oliver was born "Oliver is automatically a U.S. Citizen due to the Law of Blood."
This is because such a condition meets satisfactory requirements of United States citizenship when born abroad.
Hence, option B is correct.
Option A is not correct because Oliver doesn't need to get naturalized since both his parents are naturalized citizens already.
Option C is not correct because the law of the soil does not apply to Japanese citizenship
Option D is not correct because in this situation Oliver can not choose at birth if he is to be a citizen of Japan
Answer:Friedrich Engels was a philosopher and a communist. He saw history as a series of struggles between two social classes. He saw the development of factories and the rise of mass production as the paradigm of social abuse. He also believed that the masses that worked in these factories were alienated from the product of their labor, and that they lacked political and social power.
A factory owner would have likely seen things differently. He would have probably been happy about the rapid rate of industrialization during this time period. He would have also defended his position as owner of the means of production. Finally, it is likely that he would have seen his relationship with his employees as a fair one.
Explanation:
