The Pacific Proving Grounds<span> was the name given by the </span>United States<span> government to a number of sites in the </span>Marshall Islands<span> and a few other sites in the </span>Pacific Ocean<span> at which it conducted </span>nuclear testing<span> between 1946 and 1962. The correct answer out of the ones you listed above would be "True".</span>
Answer:
the factors like
1. limited opportunity particulars compared with the US.
2. Relative poverty ,again,as compared with the US .
3, Better quality life (better housing, better cultural facilities, less political strife or oppression a narrower gap between rich and poor etc)
Answer:
The main difference between debates in the Senate and in the House of Representatives is the time they take to debate, with the consequent effect on the pace of debate and its ideological depth.
This is so because the senators last 6 years in their positions, while the representatives only last 2, with which they have much less time to prepare the bills and debate them than the senators have available.
For this reason, the style of the debates in the House tends to be more accelerated, less ideological and often without certain formalities that necessarily prevail in the debates of the Senate.
A cash crop is an agricultural crop which is grown for sale to return a profit. It is typically purchased by parties separate from a farm.[2] The term is used to differentiate marketed crops from subsistence crops, which are those fed to the producer's own livestock or grown as food for the producer's family. In earlier times cash crops were usually only a small (but vital) part of a farm's total yield, while today, especially in developed countries, almost all crops are mainly grown for revenue. In the least developed countries, cash crops are usually crops which attract demand in more developed nations, and hence have some export value.
Prices for major cash crops are set in commodity markets with global scope, with some local variation (termed as "basis") based on freight costs and local supply and demand balance. A consequence of this is that a nation, region, or individual producer relying on such a crop may suffer low prices should a bumper crop elsewhere lead to excess supply on the global markets. This system has been criticized by traditional farmers. Coffee is an example of a product that has been susceptible to significant commodity futures price variations.[3][4]