Answer:A is false
Explanation: Even though research have suggested that being unethical is abnormal, and carried out mostly by not law abiding and not socially moral individuals, Donald Palmer recently explained that misconduct is a normal phenomenon likewise right doings and can be perpetuated by even the law abiding , ethical and social moral individuals. This he concluded by making people try to understand that psychological, social psychological, and sociological processes shape human behaviour to act morally or abhorrent.
As the third in command of the u.s. congress, the Majority party whip is responsible for political party discipline.
The party leader is a member of the party's leadership in both the Senate and House of Representatives. Both majority and minority leaders seek to align party ranks and file members with common agendas and voting styles.
In particular, party leaders coordinate with other party leaders to ensure that all MPs vote for specific laws in the same way. The name "whip" comes from the fox hunting term "whipper-in", the person who cages the foxhound.
learn more about Congress here: brainly.com/question/325850
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements is true about the defense of marriage act?
a. None of the others.
b. The members of Congress who voted for it wanted to express their support for same-sex marriage.
c. The Act stipulates that the federal government will recognize same-sex marriage.
d. The Act stipulates that states have to recognize same-sex marriage.
e. The Act stipulates that same-sex marriage partners are eligible for Social Security and Medicare benefits.
Answer
None of the others.
Explanation
Defense of marriage act was a law by the federal government of the United States Of America that defined marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman only and allowed states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. This Act allowed the states to refuse recognizing the marriages between the people of the same sex that is gay-ism and lesbianism. The act did not did not prevent individual states from recognizing same-sex marriage, but it imposed constraints on the benefits received by all legally married same-sex couples.These restriction benefits included insurance benefits for government employees, social security survivors' benefits, immigration, bankruptcy, and the filing of joint tax returns, as well as excluding same-sex spouses from the scope of laws protecting families of federal officers among other benefits.
I think it’s D not too sure
