Answer:
Option C is the correct option.
Explanation:
As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.
Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.
B.) Rule of 72; just had this question on Apex and was trying to find the answer but guessed since I couldn’t find it. Posting to save a life!
<span>the part of the development process where Dan Kim does his research on his ideas is called innovation which is where new ideas are transformed into new products</span>
Yes u can get negative cost of equity
Alcohol is most effective when used as a 70% solution.
