Answer:
the positive feedback's effect or responses are in the same direction as the initiating stimulus rather than opposite of it
Explanation:
Let's say that there a person in a team want to achieve a certain goal.
Positive feedback form team members will act as a stimulus that push that person into doing something that is aligned to the goal.
But,
When we give negative feedback under the same situation, it will cause a push back for that person that bring him/her further from the goals, so they tried harder in order to keep themselves further from the opposite directions from the goals.
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
Heredity means <span>the passing on of physical or mental characteristics genetically from one generation to another so when it works with the environment like a tree reproducing if there was no heredity there would be one tree of that kind.</span>
Answer
The Code of Hammurabi were enacted in Babylonia circa 1792 to 1750 B.C.E. It is one of the most ancient legal codes written in human history. All Babylonian citizens ought to abide to this set of rules, including the king. Therefore, it limited the king's power and prevented him to impose his will, it was against the law.
Explanation
The Code of Hammurabi is was King Hammurabi’s attempt to set a clear set of rules to all people living in a complex, large and ever-growing empire. The code intended to establish clear rules that govern people behaviour, what was considered unlawful and the punishment a citizen would expect when breaking the law. For instance, it forbidden slander, perjury, fraud, theft and adultery. It also created a legal framework for trade, slavery, divorce, liability and the relationship between workers and landowners.
The code was not necessarily fair. It was especially harsh on lower classes and women, making the laws unequal. For instance, the punishments received by higher classes when they had a dispute were far lenient than the ones imposed on lower classes.
However, and in spite this unfairness, the code limited the capacity of a single ruler to impose his/her own will over other people. The clear set of rules prevented the king from using subjective appraisals to judge singular cases. All people would measure with the same rules, and these could not change from situation to situation.
I usually try to use things like hey girl or what's up try not to make it obvious you don't know their name and/or ask someone who knows them the persons name
