Answer:
The x-term inside the radical has a negative coefficient.
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
⊕ The slope will increase
Answer:
Expected value of the game: -$0.421
Expected loss in 1000 games: $421
Step-by-step explanation:
There are two possible outcomes for the event:
- There is a 1 in 38 chance of winning $280
- There is a 37 in 38 chance of losing $8
The expected value for a single game is:
![E(X) = \frac{1}{38}*\$280-\frac{37}{38}*\$8\\E(X)=-\$0.421](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%28X%29%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B38%7D%2A%5C%24280-%5Cfrac%7B37%7D%7B38%7D%2A%5C%248%5C%5CE%28X%29%3D-%5C%240.421)
The expected value of the game is -$0.421
In 1,000 plays, the expected loss is:
![L = 1,000*-\$0.421\\L=-\$421](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=L%20%3D%201%2C000%2A-%5C%240.421%5C%5CL%3D-%5C%24421)
You would expect to lose $421.
it is 24 vjsnvfvfjobbjgbnjg ngnbb
Answer:
I'd think the first one would be correct. To determine whether or not athletes have an increase in vertical leap when wearing the shoes.
I'm not totally sure but this answer just seems the most correct. It would prove if the manufacturers clam is valid. You would have to other brand and models of shoes. You would also have to test the same kind of shoes ie, gym shoe vrs gym shoe instead of gym shoe vrs flip flop.
You would also have to use the different shoe on the same test group of users/athletes to keep a constant.
Hope I help.