Answer:
$13,616
Step-by-step explanation:
For each year we will have to constantly decrease it by 7.5%
23,500 - 7.5%
= 21,737.5
= 21,737.5 - 7.5%
= 20,107.1875
= 20,107.1875 - 7.5%
= 18599.1484375
= 18599.1484375 - 7.5%
= 17204.2123047
= 17204.2123047 - 7.5%
= 15913.8963818
= 15913.8963818 - 7.5%
= 14720.3541532
= 14720.3541532 - 7.5%
= 13616.3275917
Definitively we will get the answer $13,616
In order to find the scale factor we begin by selecting one pair of corresponding sides.
Selecting the base of the triangle
Base of triangle AC is 3 units.
Base of triangle (AC)' is 7.5 units
According to the proportion
REPLACE TH
Answer: Ola
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
