1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
skelet666 [1.2K]
3 years ago
12

A therapist wanted to determine if yoga or meditation is better for relieving stress. The therapist recruited 100 of her high-st

ress patients. Fifty of them were randomly assigned to take weekly yoga classes, and the other 50 were assigned weekly meditation classes. After one month, 30 of the 50 patients in the yoga group reported less stress, and 35 of the 50 patients in the meditation group reported less stress.
Based on the 95% confidence interval, (–0.29, 0.09), is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions of patients experiencing stress relief in the yoga and meditation groups?

There is convincing evidence because the two sample proportions are different.

There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.

There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains both negative and positive values for the true difference.
Mathematics
1 answer:
schepotkina [342]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:  Choice B

There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.

========================================================

Explanation:

The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)

This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09

The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09

Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.

Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.

The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.

You might be interested in
Not sure need help ​
lord [1]

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

3-2i+8=23

5+2i+23

2i=18

i=-9

3 0
2 years ago
The answer is 48 can someone explain how?
mestny [16]

Answer:

<h2>48</h2>

Step-by-step explanation:

(1)

apple × apple × 2apple = 54

2apple³ = 54    <em>divide both sides by 2</em>

apple³ = 27 → apple = ∛27

apple = 3

(2)

apple + apple × green_apple = 24   <em>substituite apple = 3</em>

3 + 3 × green_apple = 24        <em>subtract 3 from both sides</em>

3 × green_apple = 21         <em>divide both sides by 3</em>

green_apple = 7

(3)

strawberry - bannana - banana = 0 → strawberry = 2banana

(4)

strawberry + banana + cherry = 24     <em>substitute from (3)</em>

2banana + banana + cherry = 24

3banana + cherry = 24

(5)

apple + banana - cherry = -1          <em>substitute apple = 3</em>

3 + banana - cherry = -1         <em>subtr3 from both sides</em>

banana - cherry = -4

Add both sides of (4) and (5)

 3banana + cherry = 24

<u>+banana - cherry = -4       </u>

4banana = 20       <em>divide both sides by 4</em>

banana = 5

Substitute it to (4):

3(5) + cherry = 24

15 + cherry = 24      <em>subtract 15 from both sides</em>

cherry = 9

Substitute to the last equation:

3 + 5 × 9 = 3 + 45 = 48

/USED PEMDAS/

7 0
3 years ago
The waiting time, in hours, between successive speeders spotted by a radar unit is a continuous ran- dom variable with a cumulat
enyata [817]

Answer: 0.5507

Step-by-step explanation:

Given : The waiting time, in hours, between successive speeders spotted by a radar unit is a continuous random variable X with a cumulative distribution function

F(x)= \begin{cases}0,& x

Since , the waiting time is in hours , then we can write 12 minutes as \dfrac{12}{60} hour i.e.0.2 hour.

Now, the probability of waiting fewer than 12 minutes between successive speeders is given by :-

P(X

Hence, the required probability = 0.5507

4 0
3 years ago
What is the quotient of the following rational expression? NO random answers or links please (Timed Test).
garri49 [273]

Answer:

for the points

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
If the rvalue, or correlation coefficient, of a data set is negative, the
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The correlation coefficient being negative means that the tendency of the dots in the plane is a negative slope; the coefficientof determination tells you how close the dots are to being on the linear regression equation. This vaue falls between 0 and +1. This value will never be negative; the answer is false.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The table shows partial results of a survey about students who speak foreign languages.
    9·2 answers
  • Height in feet of 74 inches
    11·1 answer
  • 35, 32, 29, 26 find common difference
    6·2 answers
  • How many feet are in 375 cm?
    8·1 answer
  • Which problem is being modeled on the number line? helppp
    7·2 answers
  • A jar contains three red marbles to orange marbles three green marbles and four blue marbles one marble is chosen at random. Lis
    11·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST In a survey of 2,800 people who owned a certain type of​ car, 700 said they would buy that type of car agai
    7·2 answers
  • A class collects $218.43 for a field trip. If there are 27 students in the class, what is the average amount of money each stude
    5·1 answer
  • BRAINEST IF YOU GET THSI RIGHT
    11·2 answers
  • The last question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!