Answer: communication
Explanation:
you can know in order to communicate
you can write to communicate
and you can speak to communicate
The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.
The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.
Answer:
With regards to coordination, there are problems for many organizations. This could be attributed to the following variables.
Explanation:
- Throughout contact, there seems to be a discrepancy. Language always requires a leader, but it philters down as it came right down. In conversation, there seems to be a shortage of clarification and people like to believe things.
- Under responding to staff has become one of the greatest obstacles. Management teams also prevent listening toward certain staff. People are also hated and certain expectations being denied as well as the same thing is overlooked by individuals.
- The interaction also isn't treated as a managerial position starting from the company strategy to the stage including its team manager as well as superiors. There seems to be a feeling of someone not promoting discussion or sharing of thoughts in society.
- Individuals also presume that everyone else grasps the terminology that they can use. Audiences also lack attention and they almost always avoid concentrating.
Answer:
A,D,E
Explanation: just do it i had the same question